Sunday, March 27, 2011

Think Defence wades into the debate from a UK perspective.

Think Defence wades into the JSF debate via the UK's carrier conundrum.  He arrives at this proposal...

A Proposal

I actually think CVF does has a lot of potential, I know you lot might be surprised by this but my objections have always been on cost grounds. This proposal is one possible method of squeezing maximum value for the investment in the most likely missions it will be required to fulfil.
  • Switch back to the F35B
  • Obtain enough to maintain 6 on board plus 6 on an enduring land based operation (rotating with Typhoon) to support the deployed multi role brigade. This allows for continuous cover for an enduring operation whilst still maintaining enough capacity for the rapid reaction force. Total aircraft and crew numbers would be determined once maintenance and force generation factors become known
  • The RAF should stop dreaming about hordes of F35’s and get on with the job of deriving maximum benefit from the eye watering and defence budget distorting entity that is Typhoon
  • The Fleet Air Arm and Royal Navy should stop dreaming about having a mini me CVN. The FAA would cease operating fast jets and the aboard aircraft would be RAF operated. We can’t afford two air forces and the largest one, the one that can achieve some economy of scale and is focussed on managing fast jets.
  • Complete both CVF with one maintained as an in service spare to cover refit periods.
  • Do not replace Ocean, the role to be covered by CVF
  • If funds allow, the in service spare could be bought into full service
  • Redesign CVF to have an enlarged hangar, at least big enough for Chinook, CH53K and V22 across the full width and length. Also improved command and control and embarked force accommodation facilities. These should be relatively easy changes, even at this stage of the build.
  • Invest in a Merlin based ASaC
To be honest, he floored me when I read it.  Check out the whole thing to see how he got here.  I definitely don't agree with all of his conclusions...most especially the idea of doing away with fast jets in the Royal Navy.

Naval Aviation has a flavor all its own.  One that can't be duplicated by an Air Force.  I digress...head to his site.

2 comments :

  1. "Naval aviation has a flavor all its own."

    You've at least got that right. Current events unfolding over Libya is a good testimony of how ground-based and naval air power can actually change the tide of war. Whether that means drawing it to a reasonable conclusion is an entirely different story.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not too far from Libya, Iron Dome is deployed to Southern Israel.

    http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=214084

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.