Sunday, December 01, 2013

Philippines issues bid for new AAVs. No answers the call.



via PhilStar.
MANILA, Philippines - Defense officials declared a failure last month’s bidding for the supply of eight brand new amphibious assault vehicles worth P2.5 billion for the Marines.
The STAR learned that the bidding did not attract any offer from suppliers, and that only Samsung Techwin of South Korea purchased bid documents, but did not submit a bid.
In a letter to the Department of National Defense’s Bids and Awards Committee (BAC), Samsung Techwin said it might not be able to satisfy some conditions set by the bid documents, including the government’s position to seek a two-year warranty, a major cost driver.
Samsung Techwin said the amphibious assault vehicles are normally for combat operation, and that their suppliers are not willing to extend the warranty coverage beyond the first year.
“For our company to solely assume the responsibility for the 2nd year warranty will come at a high cost that will drive our price proposal way above the approved budget,” read the letter.
Samsung Techwin also believes that the government’s decision to increase the number of operation bases to four from two would also raise costs.
“The combined costs of the Harris radios and additional two operational bases cannot be accommodated in the budget,” read the letter.
Samsung Techwin also mentioned the need to clarify certain features of the Harris radios to be installed and the turnaround time, which it wanted increased to 90 days from 60 days.
“We deeply regret not joining the bid because we are sure to be disqualified anyway due to the previously mentioned reasons,” read the letter.
Not quite understanding the thinking behind the Philippine request.

Japan and others are simply taking AAVs from Marine Corps stock and having them refurbished at a fraction of the cost of new vehicles.  So why are the Filipino's wanting new builds?

It doesn't make sense, doesn't follow the trends in the region and they could probably double the number of vehicles obtained (maybe triple) if they followed the example of others.

Now is the time for the Philippine nation.  Forge stronger ties with the US, get military vehicles on the cheap from our motor pools AND modernize their military at pennies on the dollar.

One week with me being appointed defense minister, with the option of trading basing rights for new equipment and this would be a done deal.

Sidenote:  I don't understand and would love to know more about the AAV rights that are shared between BAE and Samsung Techwin.  If anyone has insight let me know.  How do two companies produce the same vehicle without controversy?  The only example that comes close is when the US had spec rights and shared the blue prints between different companies during WW2.

4 comments :

  1. The problem is that the Philippines are rife with Corrupt politicians, Generals and Admirals. They have the weakest military that is hampered by corruption and want a military that can stand up to China. Though in reality they need to clean house and clean out their corruption before they can have a Military that can stand up to China.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here is what is going on. 1. KAAV-7 is not AAV-7; it shares mechanics of the AAV-7, but features a locally developed systems internally and an enhanced armor. 2. BAE Systems no longer produces AAV-7, so BAE Systems is willing to let Samsung Techwin sell its version and receive a royalty payment. A modernized new build AAV-7 would be much more costly than the KAAV-7.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BAE is still listing the AAV as one of its products. Samsung is no longer listing it. so you tell me. is BAE still producing it or not? i think if asked they can.

      Delete
    2. Solomon,

      BAE no longer produces new build AAV-7s. The only place that does is Samsung Techwin. We know this because of the failed Japanese attempt to buy 16 new build KAAV-7s from Samsung last year. As you know, Korea is the second last place on earth Japanese would want to buy weapons from, the first being China. When the KAAV-7 deal fell apart over the Korean presidential Liancourt Rocks visit uproar, Japan then chose to buy refurbished USMC AAV-7s, not because Japan couldn't afford new build AAV-7s but because new build ones weren't available.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.