Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Canada having second thoughts about the F-35.

via Washington Post.
Many thought that by now Canada would have decided whether to buy the planes — a move that would help drive down costs in the nearly $400 billion program — or instead force the plane’s manufacturer, Lockheed Martin, to compete for its business. But it’s now unclear when that will happen.
Some fear that if nations such as Canada balk, there could be questions about the long-term affordability of the program.Meanwhile, Boeing, one of Lockheed Martin’s fiercest competitors, has pounced on what it sees as an opportunity in Canada and other countries to tout its F/A-18 Super Hornetas a proven, affordable alternative.
Facing budget constraints, Italy and the Netherlands have already curtailed the number of F-35s they said they plan to buy. Denmark is holding a competition that would pit the F-35 against other fighters. Meanwhile, the production line at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth plant has been limited to a little over 30 the past two years, as tightened U.S. budgets and technical problems have forced the Pentagon to significantly slow its procurement as well.
The unreported story that is the cutbacks that the F-35 has already suffered...and will continue to suffer.

This plane is already in a death spiral.  Italy and the Netherlands proves that...the only question is how many in the US order will get cut.  The Navy is already signalling that and so will the USAF once they see the performance of the X-47 aboard carriers.

This turkey is already stuffed.  It just needs to be stuck in the oven. 

3 comments :

  1. OK, I did not know Denmark was planning on holding a competition where the F35 would go against other fighters. They would have to wait atleast 10 years before Lockheed Martin would release an aircraft for this kind of a competitive purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Denmark, which is a Tier-3 partner in the F-35 project. In fact they already done a competition some time ago that ended with competitors withdrawing theirs proposal because everyone knows that the F-35 would be chosen for political reasons. Now let's see...

    More here: http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130901/DEFREG03/309010008/Denmark-Prioritizes-Jobs-New-Fighter-Competition

    ReplyDelete
  3. Probably still the best article there is for why Canada should go with the latest F-18 SH follow on aircraft to its current fleet of F-18s.

    http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-right-fighter-for-canada-is-the-super-hornet-not-t-1587492909

    From the article, ``I find it a very hard sell that 65 F-35s will be a better solution for Canada that offers more flexibility and capability than 80 Advanced Super Hornets, 36 stealth UCAVs and a dozen Growlers. A total force of 128 aircraft in all. Seeing as the future of air combat is surely unmanned, hedging Canada's manned fighter buy, which is supposedly going to have to be relevant for the next 30-40 years, with some extremely stealthy UCAVs makes a ton of sense. It also provides a medium endurance, low-observable surveillance platform to provide everything from intelligence gathering to network connectivity functions for Canada's "total force."

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.