Wednesday, June 08, 2011

Lockheed Martin's Paris Air Show Website.

LM has launched their Paris Air Show website here.  Make sure you check it out...well worth it.  But I have a question mixed with a suggestion for them.

LM!  If you know they hate your product and continuously run it down, then why even waste time talking to them?  I don't care who they write for...its just not worth it.  Boycott your haters guys!  And don't be fooled by wolves in sheeps clothing.

UPDATE:::

Wow.  Either great minds think alike...Lockheed Martin threatened to pull advertising --- something but I noticed that Aviation Week has an article up --- "Face to Face : Lockheed Martin CEO Robert Stevens" ...no big you say????  Oh yeah...much big!  Ya see the byline is by Joe Anselmo...he's a business writer that occasionally graces ARES with a fluff piece on the Chinese...but another name is there that stood out simply because I had never seen it before.  Anthony Velocci, Jr.  He's the freaking Editorial Director for Aviation Week.  Long story short (pure speculation on my part) he was there to ride herd on his writers. I guess someone with a much bigger megaphone than mine has been complaining about biased stories too.

Boxer IFV ...Canadian CCV Contender.

BOXER_IFV

I've become more and more interested in the Canadian competitions for a Tactical Armored Patrol Vehicle (TAPV) and Close Combat Vehicle (CCV).

I plan on trying to cover each and every contender for both programs and today's entry is from Rheinmetall Canada.  The Boxer IFV.  They've changed the profile for the Boxer for this competition.  Instead of stressing simply stressing its modularity they've added the Lancer Turret and made this a formidable war machine with scalable armor.

The "but" in all this is the comparison of the Boxer IFV with the LAV-3 currently in service with Canadian Forces.  This statement from CASR says it all...
The ARTEC Boxer is a joint venture between KMW and Rheinmetall. [1] The apparent scale of the Boxer is deceptive. The turretless Boxer is almost as tall as a LAV III, is a metre longer, and weighs tonnes more empty than fully-loaded LAV III. In other words, the Boxer is a MAV or Medium Armoured Vehicle. That said, in turreted form, the Boxer offers no advance in payload or dismounts over the CF's existing LAV III.
More to come.

Websites to check out.

33rd Fighter Wing due to get 1st F-35 this month!

via NWFDailyNews.com

Officials at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics are days away from sending Eglin Air Force Base its first of 59 Joint Strike Fighters.
“We are very close to delivering the first jet down there and I would say we believe it will happen in the month of June,” said Mike Rein, a spokesman for the company.
The arrival of the first F-35 will start a string of deliveries from this month to September. Six jets are slated for delivery by the end of the fiscal year, Rein said. The base will receive the majority of the jets within the next three years.
“While we’ll still be delivering aircraft to other bases, Eglin will be the primary focus for the coming years,” Rein said.
Since Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates restructured the program last January, Rein said the deliveries are on schedule.
The proposed delivery date when the Draft Executive Summary came out last September was four planes in 2010 and 26 planes in 2011. Instead, the first six aircraft will be bought this year and another six the following year.
The rate of delivery will eventually increase until Eglin receives its 59 aircraft.
Other than test aircraft, Eglin will be the first base to receive F-35s. The jets will be used to train F-35 pilots and maintainers at the 33rd Fighter Wing’s Joint Strike Fighter Training School.
The first pilots who will train on the F-35 will be instructors. Some of them, including Marines, are already stationed at Eglin and are a part of the cadre tasked with forming the curriculum.
Rein said Lockheed and Eglin plan to have events where the public can see the aircraft sometime this year.
Officials at the Pentagon and Eglin said the base is working closely with Lockheed Martin and will announce the jet’s arrival when the date is firmly in place.
The Joint Strike Fighter is the country’s first fifth-generation, multirole fighter.
“This is going to give our armed forces the capability that they’ve never had before and it is going to be a tremendous leap in technology,” Rein said. “We’re quite excited about it.”
The momentum has become unstoppable.  The program has survived its critics and will go into full rate production.

The Haters can pound sand....eat fish heads and rice...and shut the fuck up...

You lose boys.

Tuesday, June 07, 2011

Good enough for the Marines...Good enough for the IASF

Thanks for the article William...

via the UPI.com.  Highlighted areas are by SNAFU!  Comment on those follows the article.

Israelis favor V-22 Osprey for special ops

Published: June 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM

TEL AVIV, Israel, June 7 (UPI) -- The Israeli air force is sending a team to the United States this month to evaluate the controversial V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft that it's eyeing for search-and-rescue and covert special operations.

The successful March rescue of a downed U.S. Air Force F-15 pilot in Libya by an Osprey crew has doubtless enhanced the prospects of the multi-mission aircraft built by Bell Helicopter and Boeing Rotorcraft Systems.

"The (Israeli air force) has had its eye on the V-22 for a number of years and senior officers, including Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz have flown in it and were impressed with its capabilities," The Jerusalem Post reported Tuesday.

The air force had initially looked at the Osprey as a replacement for its aging fleet of Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion transport helicopters.

But these days, the Post added, "due to the V-22's smaller size it is being looked at a complementary platform to assist in (Israeli air force) search-and-rescue operations and dropping Special Forces behind enemy lines."

Once the air force team has fully examined the V-22 in the United States, the service's helicopter directorate will submit a recommendation to the air force commander, Gen. Ido Nehushtan.

The V-22 can carry 24 fully equipped combat troops seated -- 32 floor loaded -- or more than 19,800 pounds of internal or external cargo. It has a range of 2,500 miles with a single in-flight refueling.

The Osprey is unique because it has vertical takeoff and landing capability like a helicopter, with the rotors of its two end-of-wing Rolls-Royce AE 1107C engines in the upright position.

It can shift the three-bladed rotors 45 degrees so they operate as propellers pushing the aircraft forward, with short-takeoff and landing capability.

It can reach speeds of 350 miles per hour, about double that of a traditional helicopter.

The Osprey was first designed in the 1950s but the first V-22 wasn't rolled out until May 1988. Since then its development has taken years because of the complexity and difficulties of being the first tilt-rotor designed for military service.

It has had to overcome a series of political, funding and technical battles that threatened to scrap the project before it was certified for operational deployment.

Despite a series of high-profile fatal accidents involving the V-22, the Pentagon approved full-rate production in September 2005.

The U.S. Marine Corps deployed the MV-22 in 2007 and has been steadily replacing its CH-46 Sea Knights on a squadron-by-squadron basis. The switch is due to be completed by 2019.

The U.S. Army deployed Ospreys in 2009 and it has seen combat in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. It made its combat debut in Iraq's turbulent Anbar province, an insurgent hotbed, in November 2007(SNAFU! Note.  This has to be an error or I've been missing some really big news).
The Israeli air force team that will evaluate with V-22 will note that the U.S. Marines in Afghanistan, where the Osprey was deployed in November 2009, found that the V-22's speed and range made it a good operational match for fast combat jets.
The Marines thus split Marine Expeditionary Unit operations into two groups, one with fixed-wing jets and V-22s, the other with slower helicopters.

The U.S. Air Force's first operational CV-22 was delivered to the 58th Special Operations Wing at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., in March 2006. The aircraft is currently deployed with three Special Operations Squadrons.

There are 112 V-22s operational with U.S. forces. The Marine Corps has ordered 360 of the aircraft, each costing $110 million.

The U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command wants 50 and the U.S. Navy is expected to acquire 48.
Just a few comments on the sections I highlighted...

1.  I wrote an article a while ago (read it here) which covered the aftermath of the Israeli CH-53 crash in Romania.  In that article an Israeli General was quoted as saying that only the CH-53K could perform future missions.  IF this article is true then it appears that the Israeli Air and Space Force is tailoring its forces to almost mirror the Marine Corps.  That's a good sign.

2.  I never knew the US Army even operated Ospreys and unless I'm in error they're talking about the combat debut of the Marine's MV-22.

3.  This has been a personal area of concern with the MV-22.  If the AH-1Z was the primary escort then the speed advantage of the MV-22 would have been negated.  Those in the planning section I see already settled on fast movers to do the job instead.

4.  Is the Navy still on tap to purchase V-22's?  I thought that they allowed the requirement to die.  Time for some Googling to find out what's what with that part of the story.

SIDENOTE:


A reporter today stated that the rescue was the result of the Marine Corps being glory seeking. These are his exact words...
The U.S. Marine Corps has gotten a lot of attention for its MV-22 mission, this year, to rescue one of two downed F-15 pilots when the fighter went down in Libya owing to mechanical problems.

But the U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), not as publicity hungry or savy, has quietly carried out a far more significant search and rescue mission using its tiltrotor.

He owes the Marine Corps an apology.  It won't come but he does owe it.

Canadian Army leaps into Exercise CASTOR MOUILLÉ

C-130 avionics upgrade program.

Usually this kind of thing makes my eyes roll, but this is kinda cool...via Defesa Global...

Before the upgrade....


And then after...awesome...

Why Robert...Why????


I've had my dust ups with ARES Blog.  I've found that on one particular issue they appear to be biased, and seem to have spun facts.

I thought the bias rested with only one author.

I was wrong.

Check out this story by Robert Wall.

The U.S. Marine Corps has gotten a lot of attention for its MV-22 mission, this year, to rescue one of two downed F-15 pilots when the fighter went down in Libya owing to mechanical problems.
But the U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), not as publicity hungry or savy, has quietly carried out a far more significant search and rescue mission using its tiltrotor.
Seriously?

I mean seriously?

No, what I really mean is WHAT THE FUCK!

Lets look at the facts first, and I highly recommend that you read the whole story, but Robert reports that the AFSOC used the CV-22 to rescue personnel stuck in difficult conditions.

What difficult conditions means is beyond me.  Snow bound?  Under fire?  An injured man that needed evacuation due to a non combat related cause?  We just don't know and he doesn't say.

But to compare the rescue of service personnel under any circumstance as being more important is STUPID.

To say that the Marine Corps sought this publicity is equally insane and lastly that bit of speculation on the reporters part does nothing to advance the story but only shows his anti- Marine Corps feelings.   This last part is equally telling.
Next year, AFSOC will also be the first to stand up an overseas V-22 base, when CV-22s will be based at RAF Mildenhall, U.K.
Not only has the reporter not done his homework, not only has he introduced another non-factor into the story, but he again reveals his anti- Marine Corps bias.  How?  Because the USMC recently announced that it was going to station MV-22's in Japan.  That covers the bias part, he's playing tit for tat with V-22 basing---perhaps it was a birdie put in his ear by the non-publicity seeking AFSOC.  How did he not do his homework?  Because he is showering AFSOC with praise when SecDef Gates just announced that the US will be realigning its forces to the Pacific!  AFSOC is showing that its stuck in cold war thinking by putting necessary assets in the UK when we are moving forces (ground forces anyway) out of Europe.

I've been patient, but this kind of thing pushes me over the top.  Get a grip guys!

Want a completely opposite view of the same briefing that Robert reported on?  Check out the DewLine.

Internally Transportable Vehicle (ITV) in action with 11th MEU.

Cpl. Anthony Jones guides a light utility vehicle into a CH-53E heavy lift helicopter with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit' s aviation combat element, Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced), during an aerial transport exercise here May 24. Jones, 23, a Stuart, Fla. native, is a mortarman serving with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, the ground combat element of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit.
Photo ByLine: Lance Cpl. Claudia M. Palacios

Marines with Battalion Landing Team 3/1, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, load a Expeditionary Fire Support System into a CH-53E heavy lift helicopter from the MEU's aviation combat element, Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 268 (Reinforced) during an aerial transport exercise here May 24. This is the first time the system has been loaded into an aircraft on the West Coast.
Photo ByLine: Lance Cpl. Claudia M. Palacios

Lance Cpl. Romero Almanza from Battalion Landing Team 3/1, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, removes a roll cage from a light utility vehicle during an aerial transport exercise here May 24. This is the first time that the Expeditionary Fire Support System has been loaded into an aircraft on the West Coast.
Photo ByLine: Lance Cpl. Claudia M. Palacios