This is a note that I received from Aussie Digger regarding a conversation that we have been having.
Simply put, I think Australia needs its own Marine Corps. Here's his note to me...
but first read this article from AN.
AUSTRALIA'S first marines will be ready for war when the navy's first new landing ship enters service in 2012.
More than 1000 infantry troops from the Townsville-based 3rd
Brigade are being trained in amphibious operations and up to 350 will be
based at sea permanently as the defence force moves into a new era of
"power projection" when two massive 27,000 tonne Landing Helicopter Dock
ships enter service from 2014.
The former Royal Navy 16,000 tonne
landing ship Largs Bay, bought for $100 million to become HMAS Choules,
will be ready for low-level amphibious operations early next year.
"Whenever
one of these ships leaves Townsville she will have soldiers on board
rigged and ready to go," Defence's head of modernisation and plans Major
General John Caligari said yesterday. The amphibious force will provide
the government with a power projection capability that the nation has
never had before.
Now his note...
Hey Sol,
I remember we were discussing what the Australian Army
is going to do in relation to it's Amphibious Warfare capabilities (and
the larger Army in general) on your blog a while back?
Well the plan as of today is this:
The Australian Regular Army has a plan called Project Beersheeba
(after the famous battle of Beersheeba involving Australians in WW1) in
which it is going to become what it calls an "Army of Three's". Under
this plan they are going to create 3 similar Brigade sized groups for
our regular forces. Each Brigade will mount 2 light infantry battalions,
an artillery Regiment, an Armoured Combat Regiment - ACR, a Combat
Engineer Regiment, a Signals Regiment (including EW), a Combat Support
Regiment and the Brigade Headquarters.
Each ACR will feature 2x Cavalry Squadrons kitted out with
ASLAV-25's and variants, a Tank Squadron kitted out with our current
M1A1 AIM Abrams tanks and an armoured lift squadron, kitted out
currently with the upgraded M113AS3/4 vehicles we have. This Squadron
will have the capability to lift an entire infantry battalion in one
lift. In future our ASLAV's are going to be replaced by something like
the Boxer IFV and our M113AS3/4's are going to be replaced by something
like the Puma IFV. Both of those vehicles are currently the "objective"
vehicle (in capability terms) though the actual solution chosen may
change as they are not due in-service for another 10 years or so yet.
The M1A1 tanks are projected to continue their current TUSK upgrades and
are scheduled to remain in-service until at least 2030.
The reason behind such a structure is the size of our forces and our
training / deployment / resetting cycle for force generation. Our
Army's strategic guidance is that it should have a Brigade sized
formation available for extended, deployed operations that is
sustainable and can be rotated in place with a "like" force as well as
maintaining the capability to deploy a separate battalion sized force to
another theatre for shorter duration Ops (though not necessarily lower
intensity).
So the 3 like Brigades is how we will manage the raise, train,
sustain force generation cycle and meet our Strategic guidance
requirements with each Brigade structure, equipped and trained to the
same standards. The difference now is that our capabilities in this area
are similar, except they are grouped together (like our Tank Regiment
for example) for efficiencies sake, rather than what is optimal to
support the force as a whole in peacetime and on Ops.
Our supporting elements such as Aviation assets (MRH-90 TTH, Tiger
ARH, Chinook, UAV/EW/Air Defence assets etc) will be structured and
equipped as independant Brigades but with the element of 3 sub-units per
Brigade to support the raise, train, sustain deployment cycle.
Piggy-backing on each of the Regular Brigades will be our Army
Reserve units. These will follow the same basic structure and training
but will be equipped with less capable (and expensive) equipment but
still capable enough of being useful, an example of this would be that
instead of Puma IFV's (assuming it's chosen) the Army Reserve will use
the Bushmaster IMV. Instead of the Boxer wheeled IFV the Reserve units
will use an armoured and up-gunned version of whichever JLTV vehicle we
choose and so on.
That will give our main land combat forces 6 full Brigades (2
Divisions) that are structured and trained in an individual and
collective way to a similar degree (though the Reserves won't be as well
trained collectively) and equipped to a basic degree, the same.
So that's the main Army. Now onto the part you are probably mostly interested in:
Our new Battalion + sized Amphibious Ready Group.
To
meet the other strategic requirement, (ie: maintain at least a
battalion group capable of operations in a separate theatre) we are
going to employ our 7th regular light battalion to provide our
"Amphibious Ready Group". This battalion is going to be bigger and
structured differently to our other regular battalions, but it too is
going to comply with the rule of 3 "raise, train, sustain" mantra our
Army goes by.
It is going to be capable of generating 3x 350 'men' strong
sub-units, each capable of deploying aboard our LHD Amphibious vessels.
These elements will be trained and equipped for Amphibious Operations,
with one of the 350x men groups (let's call them Companies for
convenience sake, but they'll be nearly 3 times the size of a normal
Australian infantry Company) permanently at sea on a rotational basis on
either of the 2 LHD's or our new HMAS Choules (ex- RFA Largs Bay).
These groups will be supported with their own armour, deployable
in-direct fire support assets (unknown what this means exactly but
probably 120mm mortar systems and precision guided mortar rounds) and
supporting direct fire systems, such as Javelin / Carl Gustav
anti-armour weapons and so on.
If a larger contingency occurs, the entire Amphibious Ready Group
will be capable of deploying on the 2 LHD's supported by additional
armour, artillery, aviation, combat support and so on.
No
requirement formally exists yet, for an over the horizon landing
capability, but it's relatively early days. That requirement will almost
certainly come in future years and Australia will be looking to acquire Amphibious Assault vehicles.
So that is the plan. No Australian Marine Corps or any such thing,
but we will have a dedicated Amphibious Army unit capable of deploying
up to 1050 troops with our new LHD's, fully supported of course by
armour, artillery, aviation assets and so on.
My response to these developments?
Hell Yes!
Baby steps to a full amphibious capability only makes sense. The Aussie's see the need for a Marine type capability.
My prediction is that they will soon see a need for a full on S. Korean sized Marine Corps within a decade.
