My take on why the Japanese chose the F-35...

My take on why the Japanese chose the F-35...and why the Eurofighter keeps losing...

1.  Relationships count.  The European community has been a practical no show in the Pacific.  Until they make themselves more visible and become more active, they won't crack this market.

2.  Costs count.  Many are making an issue of the price tag of the F-35, but the latest costs came out for a little over 110 million for the airplane.  You can play all the accounting tricks that you want but this plane is still in development and its coming in at the same price points as legacy aircraft with bells and whistles.

3.  Twin engines are no longer supreme in over sea combat.  I always thought twin engine reliability has always been over stated.  The Japanese have operated their version of the F-16 in the sea strike role for a while and the F-35 will too.  The thought that twin engines are a must have make as much sense as four engines being necessary for large airplanes operating over water.

4.  China is a threat.  This is probably the biggest factor.  No matter how much some want to think of China as being a non-issue in the Pacific, that's just not the case.  We're on the cusp of a major arms race in the Pacific and the reason is China.

What should scare critics is that the F-35 is on the verge of "Western World" domination.  It will have 10 firm partner nations and two observer nations.  This has happened before and it did not spell the end of fighter development in other companies.  The European's need to quickly and efficiently start development on a 5th or 6th generation fighter in order to remain viable...the thought that they will be able to catch up via UAVs is wishful thinking.  Due to government policy in the EU, US equipment will always get a battle test first and is usually looked at as being the best in the world.

Long story short.  No one should be surprised.

Breaking! Japan picks F-35...

via Reuters...

(Reuters) - Japan picked Lockheed Martin's F-35 jet as its next mainstay fighter, choosing the radar-evading plane over combat proven but less stealthy rivals, as concerns simmer over North Korea after the death of leader Kim Jong-il and as China works to introduce its own stealth fighters.
Tuesday's decision comes as a shot in the arm for Lockheed Martin's F-35 program, which has been restructured twice in the past two years, and is expected to increase the odds that South Korea will follow suit with its own order for 60 fighters.
The F-35, which is in an early production stage, competed against Boeing's F/A-18 and the Eurofighter Typhoon, made by a consortium of European companies including BAE Systems, for a deal that could be worth up to $8 billion.
"This program badly needed an endorsement like this, particularly one from a technically respected customer. But there are still many complications, especially price tag and work share demands," said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with the Virginia-based Teal Group.
He noted the F-35 program is facing tough scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and defense officials who need to trim hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. defense budget over the next decade.
Japan, which counts the United States as its key security ally and regularly conducts joint military drills with U.S. forces, had been widely expected to choose the F-35 due to its advanced stealth capability and U.S. origin.
Fighter jets' stealth technology has drawn heavy attention in Japan since China, which has a long-running territorial dispute with Japan, in January confirmed it had held its first test flight of the J-20 stealth fighter jet.
North Korean state TV announced on Monday that Pyongyang's 69-year-old leader had died on Saturday from "physical and mental overwork."
(Additional reporting by Andrew Shalal-Esa, writing by Leika Kihara and Linda Sieg; Editing by Michael Watson and Edwina Gibbs)

LVTP(X) information request...

Hey all.

I need info, if you have on the LVTP(X).  Little information is found on the web.  Even the Marine Historical sites have little information on it.  It appears to have been developed by FMC and was competing against the current AAV for the role.  As a side note, I do realize that it was a modified M-113 (Sparks loved it), I'm aware that its sporting a 90mm gun in its turret...what I don't know is water speed, and why it was rejected by the Marines.  I suspect it had something to do with the number of troops carried but I'd like to be sure.

That's cute. Locals confuse X-47 with a UFO...

Wait...if you can't identify what is obviously an aerial vehicle then by definition it is a UFO!

Flyer Light Strike Vehicle 1....

ALSV Brochure Web1

2nd Recon Bn airborne training...

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJUENE N.C. -Marines with 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion, 2nd Marine Division, parachute toward their target landing zone during the 2nd Recon Bn. airborne jump sustainment training held aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Dec. 16. The jump was part of a quarterly training regimen for the airborne qualified Marines of 2nd Recon. , Lance Cpl. Joshua J. Hines, 1/2/2008 11:49 PM

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJUENE N.C. -Staff Sgt. Joshua Kircher, assistant platoon sergeant, 1st platoon, Company B, 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion, 2nd Marine Division, braces for landing during the 2nd Recon Bn. airborne jump sustainment training held aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Dec. 16. The jump was part of a quarterly training regimen for the airborne qualified Marines of 2nd Recon. , Lance Cpl. Joshua J. Hines, 1/2/2008 11:36 PM

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJUENE N.C. -Staff Sgt. Joshua Kircher, assistant platoon sergeant, 1st platoon, Company B, 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion, 2nd Marine Division, signals for his Marines with the “OK” signal during the 2nd Recon Bn. airborne jump sustainment training held aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Dec. 16. The jump was part of a quarterly training regimen for the airborne qualified Marines of 2nd Recon. , Lance Cpl. Joshua J. Hines, 1/2/2008 11:36 PM

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJUENE N.C. -Staff Sgt. Joshua Kircher, assistant platoon sergeant, 1st platoon, Company B, 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion, 2nd Marine Division, begins undoing his harness before recovering his parachute during the 2nd Recon Bn. airborne jump sustainment training held aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Dec. 16. The jump was part of a quarterly training regimen for the airborne qualified Marines of 2nd Recon. , Lance Cpl. Joshua J. Hines, 1/2/2008 11:37 PM

Pax River welcomes X-47B UCAS

via NAVAIR...

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT RIVER, Md. – The X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System is scheduled to arrive here tomorrow after completing a yearlong test phase at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.
Personnel departed Edwards AFB last month with the X-47B loaded on a truck for transport cross-country. 
“The transition to Pax River is a highlight for the program,” said Capt. Jaimie Engdahl, Navy UCAS program manager. “We are working toward demonstrating the aircraft’s ability to operate on and around an aircraft carrier.” 
The X-47B is a tailless, autonomous, unmanned aircraft that Northrop Grumman is developing and testing for the Navy’s UCAS Demonstration program. X-47B is the first fixed-wing unmanned system designed to operate from a Navy aircraft carrier.
The Navy and Northrop Grumman conducted first flight of the X-47B in February 2011 at Edwards AFB. Since then, the aircraft has undergone a series of flight tests demonstrating its performance under a variety of conditions.
The combined Navy/industry UCAS-D team will conduct shore-based carrier suitability tests at Pax River in 2012. Tests will verify the X-47B's ability to communicate with the aircraft carrier and to operate safely and effectively with the ship's catapult and arresting gear.
Testing at Pax River will be conducted following stringent flight safety procedures and will be conducted within restricted airspace. The first X-47B flight at Pax River is planned for spring 2012. A second X-47B aircraft is also scheduled to arrive early next year. 

ACV competition...what will we likely see...

What will we likely see in the ACV competition to replace the AAV?

More than likely two firms offering vehicles and a few others offering some types of upgrade packages.

I initially see General Dynamics revamping its original EFV offering.  Hopefully this will involve the removal of the  hydroplanning system...a redesign of the vehicles interior and a decent exit ramp.

I'm actually surprised that the Marine Corps didn't sole source this competition and list what had to go and what needed to stay with this vehicle that had so much money pumped into it.  Actually this is probably the best case scenario but won't happen as funds are tight and HQMC seems to be saving all of its money to support the F-35 and MV-22 even at the expense of the much needed CH-53K, AH-1Z, UH-1Y and an upgraded HUMVEE.

The other option is that we see BAE come up with an improved AAV.  This would likely involve an upgraded power train and suspension, added armor and blast seats, some type of improved weapon station and upgraded water jets.

What will be interesting is whether HQMC would allow for new build AAVs or if it would be a pure upgrade program.  The other players in this game will only offer upgrades of one type or another. 

Blast from the past. Cruise missile carriers...

Surfing the net I ran across the Cruise Missile Carrier concept from the 70's based on wide body civil airliners.

While the option at the time was between using them or the B-2 in the nuclear deterrence role, the concept is valid in my opinion in the Air-Sea Battle of today.

G-2 mil stated on his blog the following...

B-747s can also dominate the world's oceans.  A squadron of 12 B-747s loaded with anti-ship cruise missiles can be vectored toward a enemy fleet by satellites or submarines, while E-3 Sentry AWACS provide escort with long-range radar.  The squadron can break into four flights and launch a total of 1064 cruise missiles at a naval fleet from four directions a thousand miles away.

While he goes on to make some statements that I disagree with his basic premise seems sound.  And valuable for a future war at sea.  Taking the nuclear mission out of the equation and you have massive firepower that will have to be protected but could saturate targets at sea and land with cruise missiles outside the range of threat weapon systems.

If we were to develop high speed cruise missiles like our potential enemies then we could in essence have a Chinese carrier killer all in one airplane.  Any idea of denying our forces entry into a particular region of the Pacific could be denied with a flight of F-22's with tankers escorting a couple of B-747 cruise missile carriers.

The Air Force would never rethink its thinking on the concept but it is a fascinating blast from the past.

A-4's in the attack...

Neptunus Lex ran an article which details low level flight.

The link he provides is beyond awesome....and the photo you see above is from that link.  An Argentinian A-4 attacking British shipping.

Now take another look.

Did you only see the A-4 in the center of the photo?

Or did you notice his wingman to our visual right?

Low level attack in a small airplane.  I can't even begin to imagine how small the target must be with a high speed anti-ship cruise missile.